Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date
Msg-id 16c89f6c65dcfe4b277c7befe3ed19d3@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> I had a discussion with Marko T just a couple of weeks back, and the
> conclusion then was that at the time, 9.6 had almost nothing that would
> even make the cut for a press release. We now have these two features,
> which are great features, but I'm not sure it's enough for such a big
> symbolical bump.

Postgres 10: we finally fixed our stupid name!

:)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201603221244
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAlbxdm0ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjOEwCgggx+w2A5N5sy3P+2EnLyP559
e00An0VWQH9UpxvWd41ttGJx/e1DXzUV
=nWtM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0