Re: Bug tracker tool we need - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Bug tracker tool we need
Date
Msg-id CABUevEyKcBxCoj7shBUXEx1hBh0qjqb1EDopY54czixM-nOtFw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug tracker tool we need  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bug tracker tool we need  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 04:30, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>> That's probably one reason people aren't jumping on this. Because
>>> there is no tracker out there that people actually *like*...
>
>> I think this is a point worth serious thought.
>
> Indeed.  The only one I've got extensive experience with is Bugzilla
> (because Red Hat uses it) and I do cordially hate it.  At least some
> of that is due to bureaucratic practices RH has evolved, like cloning
> bugs N times for N affected releases, but I think the tool encourages
> such things.  So when I read Andrew's recent suggestion that we use
> Bugzilla, my immediate reaction was "egad, can't we do better?".
> Maybe we can't :-(.

Personally, I'd say we *already* do better than that...

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.3 Pre-proposal: Range Merge Join
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug tracker tool we need