Re: Bug tracker tool we need - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bug tracker tool we need
Date
Msg-id 14172.1334716224@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug tracker tool we need  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Bug tracker tool we need  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: Bug tracker tool we need  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> That's probably one reason people aren't jumping on this. Because
>> there is no tracker out there that people actually *like*...

> I think this is a point worth serious thought.

Indeed.  The only one I've got extensive experience with is Bugzilla
(because Red Hat uses it) and I do cordially hate it.  At least some
of that is due to bureaucratic practices RH has evolved, like cloning
bugs N times for N affected releases, but I think the tool encourages
such things.  So when I read Andrew's recent suggestion that we use
Bugzilla, my immediate reaction was "egad, can't we do better?".
Maybe we can't :-(.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] Checkpointer on hot standby runs without looking checkpoint_segments
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options with positional argumen