Re: slotname vs slot_name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: slotname vs slot_name
Date
Msg-id CABUevExSkHORhBtvA8-N99rOtOp4kbRL6oA4oqwf3-SR1n8NGw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: slotname vs slot_name  (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: slotname vs slot_name  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
<p dir="ltr"><br /> On Jun 5, 2014 10:22 AM, "Devrim Gündüz" <<a
href="mailto:devrim@gunduz.org">devrim@gunduz.org</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > Hi,<br /> ><br />
>On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 10:57 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:<br /> > > BTW, what about also renaming pg_llog
directory?I'm afraid that<br /> > > a user can confuse pg_log with pg_llog.<br /> ><br /> > +1. I hit this
whiletesting 9.4 this week. Should be confusing for many<br /> > end-users.<br /> ><p dir="ltr">+500. We already
havetwo directories that users remove to get free space thinking it's safe because it's just log files. We don't need
onemore :-) <p dir="ltr">/Magnus  

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Re: slotname vs slot_name
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)