Re: slotname vs slot_name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: slotname vs slot_name
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQQM8eQxD0E0UwxgF94wY3SJvtha3Nm1fNhV+83dnzdwQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: slotname vs slot_name  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2014 10:22 AM, "Devrim Gündüz" <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 10:57 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> > BTW, what about also renaming pg_llog directory? I'm afraid that
>> > a user can confuse pg_log with pg_llog.
>>
>> +1. I hit this while testing 9.4 this week. Should be confusing for many
>> end-users.
>>
>
> +500. We already have two directories that users remove to get free space
> thinking it's safe because it's just log files. We don't need one more :-)
Adding a +1 on top of this already-huge stack.
--
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: tests for client programs
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)