Re: Clarification related to BDR - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Clarification related to BDR
Date
Msg-id CABUevExMUp69y+y3sUYZ5MNC1vPQ=1cZwn30Beo2W4f++33UYg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Clarification related to BDR  (Santhosh Kumar <krssanthosh@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general


On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 9:01 AM Santhosh Kumar <krssanthosh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
 I came across a link published in postgresql, where it is clearly mentioned BDR as an open source. When I tried to install BDR for CentOS from 2ndQuadrant, the yum repository was not reachable and upon further enquiring with 2ndQuadrant, I got a reply from them quoting as follows 

"BDR is not open source. We do not have plans to open source this."

 Can you please help me understand, why the following news is published in "postgresql" with an encouraging message acknowledging BDR as an open source? We invested time and effort to use BDR only to understand at a later point in time, that it is not. Kindly clarify, if I am missing anything. 


image.png



This news is from 2016. At that time, BDR was open source, but it has since been closed.

//Magnus

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Check what has been done for a uncommitted prepared transaction
Next
From: Andreas Kretschmer
Date:
Subject: Re: Clarification related to BDR