Re: Changing pg_dump default file format - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Changing pg_dump default file format
Date
Msg-id CABUevExGSG_7=Z=8z2AxdG3hrD8Y8RrvT0ssNieW1Rc2GVqnaQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Changing pg_dump default file format  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Changing pg_dump default file format  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/07/2013 08:21 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
>>> I humbly request on behalf of those who manage production postgresql
>>> instances that we change the default backup file format from -Fp to -Fc.
>>
>>
>> -1 in the case that output goes to stdout.  It might make sense for
>> when -f is specified.  As a DBA, 90% of my usage of pg_dump was
>> piped to psql, with the rest split between data-only dumps for
>> individual tables and schema-only dumps.  I think I used -Fc about
>> twice -- before I figured out how to do PITR-style backups.
>>
>
> PITR is wonderful, I use it all the time. It has exactly zero to do with
> what we are talking about. We are talking about pg_dump and its usefulness.
> Are you suggesting that we tell people to not use pg_dump and instead use
> PITR?

For backups, absolutely.

That is, assuming you mean "pg_basebackup -x", and not full
archive_command/full pitr setup.

That's still a separate argument, of course.


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: alter_table regression test problem
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing pg_dump default file format