Re: File based Incremental backup v9 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: File based Incremental backup v9
Date
Msg-id CABUevExFDAt5fjGV9pqcHMUNJ3ty5Yo5xA-YvNogJC5MwhA-EA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: File based Incremental backup v9  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: File based Incremental backup v9  (Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@2ndquadrant.it>)
Re: File based Incremental backup v9  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Marco Nenciarini
<marco.nenciarini@2ndquadrant.it> wrote:
> Il 31/01/15 17:22, Erik Rijkers ha scritto:
>> On Sat, January 31, 2015 15:14, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
>>
>>> 0001-public-parse_filename_for_nontemp_relation.patch
>>> 0002-copydir-LSN-v2.patch
>>> 0003-File-based-incremental-backup-v8.patch
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like it only compiles with assert enabled.
>>
>
> It is due to a typo (assert instead of Assert). You can find the updated
> patch attached to this message.

I would sure like it if you would avoid changing the subject line
every time you post a new version of this patch.  It breaks the
threading for me.

+1 - it does break gmail.



It seems to have also broken it for the CommitFest app, which thinks
v3 is the last version.  I was not able to attach the new version.

The CF app has detected that it's the same thread, because of the headers (gmail is the buggy one here - the headers of the email are perfectly correct).

It does not, however, pick up and show the change of subject there (but you can see if if you click the link for the latest version into the archives - the link under "latest" or "latest attachment" both go to the v9 patch). 

 
When I clicked on "attach thread" without having logged in, it took me
to a bad URL.  When I clicked on it after having logged in, it

Clearly a bug.

 
purported to work, but AFAICS, it didn't actually do anything.

That's because the thread is already there, and you're adding it again. Of course, it wouldn't hurt if it actually told you that :) 

--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand
Next
From: José Luis Tallón
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: [GENERAL] 4B row limit for CLOB tables