On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 7:43 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > I remember that whole thing with pycryptodomex being confusing.
(While it's way outside the scope of this thread: if there aren't any specific reasons to remain on `pycryptodome` as opposed to something OpenSSL-backed like `cryptography`, it's probably overdue for a port.)
(Late response, sorry)
I don't think there are any specific reasons, no. So if that's the goal it should be just a SMOP :)
