Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
Date
Msg-id CABUevEwVsphx0vnKPOBjRHxhMZ0yrbmZjurLOuh+kWa91sP96Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting forcheckpoint  (Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
> wrote:
>> ISTM the consensus is that there should be no output in regular mode,
>> but a message should be displayed in verbose and progress mode.

> Agreed, and applied as one patch.

Is there an argument for back-patching this?

Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did.

I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take your comment as a vote that we should back-patch it? 

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint