Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!
Date
Msg-id CABUevEw5N-5bBAmLPqS87APsHKnm5h9=c8SdH1YhpCV0NnmG8A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> On 09/24/2015 12:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I agree with the idea that we don't yet want to give the impression that
>> this is the official bug tracker.  However, "beta-bugs" could give the
>> impression that it was specifically for bugs about 9.5beta, without
>> dispelling the idea that it is official.  Maybe "bugs-test.p.o"?

> I'd suggest instead just having a big banner up in the page header which
> says "this system is currently beta and not yet the canonical source for
> postgres bug information".  That way, if it does become the canonical
> source, we won't go breaking everyone's links when we change the domain
> name.

Works for me, if it's not too hard to do.

If that's hard to do, then we're using the wrong system.... 

--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff
Date:
Subject: Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT issues around whole row vars,