The numbers you posted look exactly as I would expect. The first read hits disk and takes 108ms, the second read hits the cache and takes 27ms.On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Sumeet Shukla <sumeet.k.shukla@gmail.com> wrote:Both the first run and subsequent run takes same amount of time.First Run:"Seq Scan on d_payer (cost=0.00..8610.40 rows=121788 width=133) (actual time=8.760..98.582 rows=121788 loops=1)"" Buffers: shared read=2521""Planning time: 16.820 ms""Execution time: 108.626 ms"Second Run:"Seq Scan on d_payer (cost=0.00..8610.40 rows=121788 width=133) (actual time=0.010..18.456 rows=121788 loops=1)"" Buffers: shared hit=2521""Planning time: 0.083 ms""Execution time: 27.288 ms"Can anyone please help me understand and fix this.Thanks & Regards,Sumeet Shukla
Both the first run and subsequent run takes same amount of time.First Run:"Seq Scan on d_payer (cost=0.00..8610.40 rows=121788 width=133) (actual time=8.760..98.582 rows=121788 loops=1)"" Buffers: shared read=2521""Planning time: 16.820 ms""Execution time: 108.626 ms"Second Run:"Seq Scan on d_payer (cost=0.00..8610.40 rows=121788 width=133) (actual time=0.010..18.456 rows=121788 loops=1)"" Buffers: shared hit=2521""Planning time: 0.083 ms""Execution time: 27.288 ms"Can anyone please help me understand and fix this.Thanks & Regards,Sumeet Shukla
First Run:
"Seq Scan on d_payer (cost=0.00..8610.40 rows=121788 width=133) (actual time=8.760..98.582 rows=121788 loops=1)"" Buffers: shared read=2521""Planning time: 16.820 ms""Execution time: 108.626 ms"
Second Run:
"Seq Scan on d_payer (cost=0.00..8610.40 rows=121788 width=133) (actual time=0.010..18.456 rows=121788 loops=1)"" Buffers: shared hit=2521""Planning time: 0.083 ms""Execution time: 27.288 ms"
Can anyone please help me understand and fix this.
pgsql-performance by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных