Re: Bug in ALTER COLUMN SET DATA TYPE ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: Bug in ALTER COLUMN SET DATA TYPE ?
Date
Msg-id CABOikdOzm6s+wKqk_76aXGiWGRgM=4_t16=bbTWSw5JPG4jYvw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in ALTER COLUMN SET DATA TYPE ?  (Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Bug in ALTER COLUMN SET DATA TYPE ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers



On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils@gmail.com> wrote:
 
So coming back to the issue, do you think it's a good idea to teach ATAddCheckConstraint() that the call is coming from a late phase of ALTER TABLE ?

+1

You mentioned AT_PASS_OLD_INDEX in your original mail, but I guess that you meant that we should check for  AT_PASS_OLD_CONSTR and then not raise an error? 


Yeah, I meant  AT_PASS_OLD_CONSTR.

Thanks,
Pavan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nikhil Sontakke
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in ALTER COLUMN SET DATA TYPE ?
Next
From: Florian Weimer
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronous commit not... synchronous?