Yes, that makes sense.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:16 AM Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:23 PM, <calebmeredith8@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This doesn't seem to be intended as the GRANT specification allows it, and
>> CREATE POLICY supports the ALL command.
>>
>
> Yeah, I would tend to agree that the existence of ALL contradicts the
> expression constraints that are in place when defining a non-ALL policy as
> we could basically ignore either the WITH CHECK or USING clauses defined in
> a policy defined depending on the DML or SELECT command used. To be more
> exact, for example with an ALL policy that has both a WITH CHECK and USING
> defined, we would ignore the USING clause with an INSERT query, right? We
> are in beta2 state now, so I don't think anything is going to change, but
> Stephen, your thoughts perhaps?
> --
> Michael
>
