Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ian Lawrence Barwick
Subject Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion
Date
Msg-id CAB8KJ=iNTR6NOSd=EVmSqcGURNbyO9ah3tKZtz1p8KzNzc1ugA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
2021年11月9日(火) 20:31 Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>:
>
> > On 14 Jul 2021, at 14:03, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
> >
> > The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> > make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
> > Implements feature:       tested, passed
> > Spec compliant:           tested, passed
> > Documentation:            tested, passed
> >
> > The v3 patch LGTM. I wonder if we should explicitly say in pg_rewind tests that
> > they _don't_ have to call `checkpoint`, or otherwise, we will lose the test
> > coverage for this scenario. But I don't have a strong opinion on this one.
> >
> > The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
>
> Heikki, do you have plans to address this patch during this CF?

Friendly reminder ping one year on; I haven't looked at this patch in
detail but going by the thread contents it seems it should be marked
"Ready for Committer"? Moved to the next CF anyway.

Regards

Ian Barwick



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GetNewObjectId question