Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTn00tMxN1Jumjd+SiZ7wPQ0UNVNo9X_UN7dSxgt9inyQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> By the discussions so far, I'm planning to have several replication
> methods such as 'quorum', 'complex' in the feature, and the each
> replication method specifies the syntax of s_s_names.
> It means that s_s_names could have the number of sync standbys like
> what current patch does.

What if the application_name of a standby node has the format of an integer?
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive
Next
From: Vitaly Burovoy
Date:
Subject: Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes