Re: WAL consistency check facility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: WAL consistency check facility
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT_2h1VfBwrjrPnfoTxZhsrcjCHpDFYGRxUyOwzs50s7A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think you have the right to tell Kuntal that he has to move
> the patch to the next CommitFest because there are unspecified things
> about the current version you don't like.  If you don't have time to
> review further, that's your call, but he can leave the patch as Needs
> Review and see if someone else has time.

No complain from here if done this way. I don't mean any offense :)
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Printing bitmap objects in the debugger