Re: WAL consistency check facility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: WAL consistency check facility
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTVVUMKRq70XEyqSeRUi9nDEz2nUa5scTG97YF3vTJOQw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't think you have the right to tell Kuntal that he has to move
>> the patch to the next CommitFest because there are unspecified things
>> about the current version you don't like.  If you don't have time to
>> review further, that's your call, but he can leave the patch as Needs
>> Review and see if someone else has time.
>
> No complain from here if done this way. I don't mean any offense :)

Seeing nothing happening, I have moved the patch to next CF as there
is a new version, but no reviews for it.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Sample configuration files