On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Perhaps the "logpath" buffer that the filename is constructed in
>>> needs to be made bigger. 64 bytes was obviously enough with the
>>> old pattern, but it's not with the new.
>
>> Oops, yes, that seems like a good idea. How about 64 -> MAXPGPATH?
>
> If we want to stick with the fixed-size-buffer-on-stack approach,
> that would be the thing to use. psprintf is another possibility,
> though that would add a malloc/free cycle.
MAXPGPATH is used quite a lot in the binaries of src/bin/, just using
that seems fine to me.. My 2c.
--
Michael