Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTWVS47+wNYn6O0vafKCdSucMNV-xOVZdmU+FPpUV6E+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
List pgsql-hackers


On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I wrote:
> Here's a rewritten patch that looks at postmaster.pid instead of
> pg_control.  It should be effectively the same as the prior patch in terms
> of response to directory-removal cases, and it should also catch many
> overwrite cases.

BTW, my thought at the moment is to wait till after next week's releases
to push this in.  I think it's probably solid, but it doesn't seem like
it's worth taking the risk of pushing shortly before a wrap date.

That seems a wiser approach to me. Down to which version are you planning a backpatch? As this is aimed for the buildfarm stability with TAP stuff, 9.4?
--
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: dinesh kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposing COPY .. WITH PERMISSIVE
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff