Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
Date
Msg-id 17711.1443847144@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Here's a rewritten patch that looks at postmaster.pid instead of
> pg_control.  It should be effectively the same as the prior patch in terms
> of response to directory-removal cases, and it should also catch many
> overwrite cases.

BTW, my thought at the moment is to wait till after next week's releases
to push this in.  I think it's probably solid, but it doesn't seem like
it's worth taking the risk of pushing shortly before a wrap date.

If anyone wants to argue for including it in the releases, speak up ...
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Next
From: dinesh kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposing COPY .. WITH PERMISSIVE