Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTSOHkTrAnY2mwhvSRMHrgGZNAQJCGPm34wd2ZBq-FYeQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> To get things rolling, I have committed just the basic TAP tests, to
> give it a spin on the build farm.  I'll work through the rest in the
> coming days.

Thanks!
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: issue: record or row variable cannot be part ofmultiple-item INTO list