Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Date
Msg-id 68eee9f1-864d-a6f8-cbf9-dd9bda6be9be@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/19/17 19:00, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> To get things rolling, I have committed just the basic TAP tests, to
>> give it a spin on the build farm.  I'll work through the rest in the
>> coming days.

I have reverted this because of the build farm issue.  Putting the patch
on hold in the CF until we have a new plan.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47language tags. Should it?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling