Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTQN1Y9ByX-Xrc7ynFCG8g1_5H0U3G26Lyqr+r6NacwFg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't in the end care very much about how we solve this problem.
> But I'm glad you agree that whatever we do to solve the simple problem
> should be a logical subset of what the full solution will eventually
> look like, not a completely different design.  I think that's
> important.

Yes, please let's use the custom language, and let's not care of not
more than 1 level of nesting so as it is possible to represent
pg_stat_replication in a simple way for the user.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2