Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZrv1YSe7ZzA6A3eb=NZ0TdbsmxS30eRTvNZ2Tah=+eZw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, please let's use the custom language, and let's not care of not
> more than 1 level of nesting so as it is possible to represent
> pg_stat_replication in a simple way for the user.

"not" is used twice in this sentence in a way that renders me not able
to be sure that I'm not understanding it not properly.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2