Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTDwNbnpZfZ=xxe=J9bQCLqsK+LFTuWa9OA25Q4zSG6SA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This sentence is actually wrong, a feedback message is never sent with
>>> the feedback message.
>>
>> Eh?
>
> "A feedback message is never sent depending on the status interval".
>
>> I think this looks basically fine, though I'd omit the short option
>> for it.  There are only so many letters in the alphabet, so let's not
>> use them up for developer-convenience options.
>
> No objections to that.

Okay. Here is an updated patch incorporating those comments.
-- 
Michael

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY