Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQpswBAuNPsJXM+Nj=-bqC2L2vCdUZVf6Bx98C90p2msQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This sentence is actually wrong, a feedback message is never sent with
>> the feedback message.
>
> Eh?

"A feedback message is never sent depending on the status interval".

> I think this looks basically fine, though I'd omit the short option
> for it.  There are only so many letters in the alphabet, so let's not
> use them up for developer-convenience options.

No objections to that.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gaddam Sai Ram
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CurTransactionContext freed before transaction COMMIT???
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Typos in src/backend/optimizer/README