Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT6tRpsy3SrG+-DZ0Rt+UM6NedMUik5oSG1P963_Xz2xA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
> OTOH, Our built in compressor as we all know is a complete dog in
> terms of cpu when stacked up against some more modern implementations.
> All that said, as long as there is a clean path to migrating to
> another compression alg should one materialize, that problem can be
> nicely decoupled from this patch as Robert pointed out.
I am curious to see some numbers about that. Has anyone done such
comparison measurements?
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Status of CF 2014-10 and upcoming 2014-12