Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT+3iVJs=WB9y4d+R_O2rmRJTCmJxzxYK3bT+0oko0e4A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Well for indexes you don't really need to add the new AT command, as
> IndexStmt has char *idxcomment which it will automatically uses as comment
> if not NULL. While  I am not huge fan of the idxcomment it doesn't seem to
> be easy to remove it in the future and it's what transformTableLikeClause
> uses so it might be good to be consistent with that.

Oh, right, I completely missed your point and this field in IndexStmt.
Yes it is better to be consistent in this case and to use it. It makes
as well the code easier to follow.
Btw, regarding the new AT routines, I am getting find of them, it
makes easier to follow which command is added where in the command
queues.

Updated patch attached.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql-9.5alpha1 packaging
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22