Re: PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22
Date
Msg-id 13963.1436022155@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22  (Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com> writes:
> for what I see the hstore_plperl link has a double problem.
> It requires a link to hstore
> as it also requires a link to perl.
> Attached patch for solving this and a similar issue with python.

> +ifeq ($(PORTNAME), cygwin)
> +# This means we need an in-tree build on Windows, not a pgxs build
> +SHLIB_LINK += -L../hstore -lhstore -L$(perl_archlibexp)/CORE -lperl
> +endif
> [ and likewise for the other contrib transform modules ]

I wondered how come we had not seen this problem in the buildfarm,
but the answer appears to be that our only working Cygwin critter
(brolga) doesn't build any of the optional PLs, so it skips these
modules altogether.  Seems like we need to improve that situation.

Also, I noted that the "regular win32" path in these makefiles
says, eg,

ifeq ($(PORTNAME), win32)
# these settings are the same as for plperl
override CPPFLAGS += -DPLPERL_HAVE_UID_GID -Wno-comment
# This means we need an in-tree build on Windows, not a pgxs build
SHLIB_LINK += ../hstore/libhstore.a $(wildcard ../../src/pl/plperl/libperl*.a)
endif

It's not apparent to me how that works at all.  It seems to specify
hard-linking a copy of hstore as well as a copy of plperl into the
shlib for hstore_plperl.  Then at runtime, there will *also* be the
hstore and plperl shlibs in memory.  At best that means substantial
memory bloat, but it seems likely to me that it would fail altogether,
particular for plperl which has got a substantial amount of semantically-
important static storage.  Two copies of that storage will not end well.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: Let PostgreSQL's On Schedule checkpoint write buffer smooth spread cycle by tuning IsCheckpointOnSchedule?