Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSx_O8MW5TXoTqgKoyEc=tREP6+N5QQsqdnXTBnYV+Pdw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> ... Would you think
>> that it is acceptable to add the number of index scans that happened
>> with the verbose output then?
>
> I don't have an objection to it, but can't you tell that from VACUUM
> VERBOSE already?  There should be a "INFO:  scanned index" line for
> each scan.

Of course, sorry for the noise.
-- 
Michael


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues for foreign tables
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums