Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums
Date
Msg-id 16915.1511718593@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> ... Would you think
> that it is acceptable to add the number of index scans that happened
> with the verbose output then?

I don't have an objection to it, but can't you tell that from VACUUM
VERBOSE already?  There should be a "INFO:  scanned index" line for
each scan.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Юрий Соколов
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance degradation of contended LWLock on NUMA
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo