Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSjFcudQbL+wZGY9xa-bHHOe2AqfuPb9Awsjt-3HZ+6ew@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> those are functions that are no longer used but Josh considered they
> could become useful before release.
> i can put them inside #ifdef _NOT_USED_ decorations or just remove
> them now and if/when we find some use for them re add them
Why not simply removing them? They will be kept in the git history either way.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: strncpy is not a safe version of strcpy
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: strncpy is not a safe version of strcpy