On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2017-10-16 16:59:59 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 9/20/17 04:32, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > Here's what I roughly was thinking of. I don't quite like the name, and
>> > the way the version is specified for libpq (basically just the "raw"
>> > integer).
>>
>> "forced_protocol_version" reads wrong to me. I think
>> "force_protocol_version" might be better. Other than that, no issues
>> with this concept.
>
> Yea, I agree. I've read through the patch since, and it struck me as
> odd. Not sure how I came up with it...
Andres, could you update the patch?
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
