On 2017-10-16 16:59:59 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/20/17 04:32, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Here's what I roughly was thinking of. I don't quite like the name, and
> > the way the version is specified for libpq (basically just the "raw"
> > integer).
>
> "forced_protocol_version" reads wrong to me. I think
> "force_protocol_version" might be better. Other than that, no issues
> with this concept.
Yea, I agree. I've read through the patch since, and it struck me as
odd. Not sure how I came up with it...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
