On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de> wrote:
> Re: Petr Jelinek 2014-11-25 <5474EFEA.2040000@2ndquadrant.com>
>> >Patch committed.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> I'm a bit late to the party, but wouldn't
>
> recovery_target_action = ...
>
> have been a better name for this? It'd be in line with the other
> recovery_target_* parameters, and also a bit shorter than the imho
> somewhat ugly "action_at_recovery_target".
Looks like a good idea to me. Why not as well mark
pause_at_recovery_target as deprecated in the docs and remove it in,
let's say, 2 releases?
--
Michael
