Re: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSbPZTMgm8zspP2jj5B+1JUwB8odhhSPUbyufR-AoHMwQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This week I had a problem where I wanted to drop only the privileges a
> certain role had in the system, while keeping all the objects.  I couldn't
> figure out a reasonable way to do that, so I've attached a patch for this to
> this email.  Please consider it for inclusion into 9.5.  The syntax is:
>
>   DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY role [, ...]
>
> I at some point decided to implement it as a new command instead of changing
> DropOwnedStmt, and I think that might have been a mistake.  It might have
> made more sense to instead teach DROP OWNED to accept a specification of
> which things to drop.  But the proposal is more important than such details,
> I think.
You should consider adding it to the upcoming CF:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=25
Regards,
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces