On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Haribabu Kommi wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Haribabu Kommi
>> <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And one more thing, the vacuumdb password behavior is present in back branches
>> also, is it worth back patching the vacuumdb fix to all supported
>> branches and apply
>> the jobs connection fix only to master and 9.5?
>
> Given the lack of complaints, I doubt it's worth the destabilization
> risk. Let's just patch 9.5 and be done with it.
Fine for me. --all is supported for ages.
--
Michael