Re: Can we trust fsync? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Can we trust fsync?
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSXatTQpVfaEqMG4uk2m4Qg0FN22DJUYbMCK6ZFpmLYQg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Can we trust fsync?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> The program is diskchecker:
>>
>>         http://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html
>>
>> I got the author to re-host the source code on github a few years ago.
>
> It might be worth re-implementing this for -contrib. The fact that we
> mention diskchecker.pl in the docs, and it is a pretty obscure Perl
> script on some guy's personal website doesn't inspire much confidence.
Yes, having that in contrib would be useful. Those would bring a plus
when testing disks for Postgres.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Building on S390
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency