Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSVzxr_mhW6+DzFFmUEv8xqYVd09zcSD00UqdVcF-fWug@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich@gmx.de> writes:
>> Tom Lane writes:
>>> We've dealt with similar issues in places like pg_relation_size() by
>>> making the functions return NULL instead of throwing an error for an
>>> unmatched argument OID.
>
>> Note that Michael Paquier sent a patch implementing this in another
>> thread:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTxF5dtxjEzB7xkJvOWxX8D_2atxmTu3PSnkhcWT_JY5A@mail.gmail.com
>
> Ah, I had a feeling that this had come up recently, but failed to remember
> that there was already a patch.  Maybe we should just bump up the priority
> of reviewing that patch.

Indeed, I didn't immediately recall that by looking at this thread.
That's registered in the next CF, so it is not lost.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: sslmode=require fallback
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Unable to test parallel aggregate/joins in Postgres beta 2