Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition
Date
Msg-id 9810.1468520424@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition  (Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich@gmx.de>)
Responses Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich@gmx.de> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> We've dealt with similar issues in places like pg_relation_size() by
>> making the functions return NULL instead of throwing an error for an
>> unmatched argument OID.

> Note that Michael Paquier sent a patch implementing this in another
> thread:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTxF5dtxjEzB7xkJvOWxX8D_2atxmTu3PSnkhcWT_JY5A@mail.gmail.com

Ah, I had a feeling that this had come up recently, but failed to remember
that there was already a patch.  Maybe we should just bump up the priority
of reviewing that patch.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving executor performance
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_xlogdump follow into the future