Re: September 2015 Commitfest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: September 2015 Commitfest
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSRmugC2-w7Jb9p2qq9SebvTdgyVM8XzsSNQpTsfwyCtg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to September 2015 Commitfest  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: September 2015 Commitfest  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> To review (copying Heikki's message):
>
> 1. Pick a patch from the list at:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/6/
>
> 2. Review it. Test it. Try to break it. Do we want the feature? Any
> weird interactions in corner-cases? Does it have the intended or an
> unintended performance impact?
>
> 3. Reply on the thread on pgsql-hackers with your findings.
>
> It is perfectly OK to review a patch that someone else has signed up for as
> reviewer - different people tend to pay attention to different things.

We are close to the end of October, and the numbers are a bit more
encouraging than at the beginning:
Needs review: 27.
Waiting on Author: 12.
Ready for Committer: 5.
Committed: 30
Among the five patches marked as ready for committer, one is a bug fix
that should be back-patched (ahem). Shouldn't we move on with those
entries first? Also, to all reviewers and authors, please be sure that
the status of your patch is correctly updated.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Rework access method interface
Next
From: dinesh kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message