Re: Recovery to backup point - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Recovery to backup point
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSHwtP57QkmG_U3_YK8tU=rO12C_VwGZ+Nr4+gNA1Sugw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Recovery to backup point  ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Recovery to backup point  ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:08 AM, MauMau <maumau307@gmail.com> wrote:
> C2. "recovery_target = 'immediate'" sounds less intuitive than my suggestion
> "recovery_target_time = 'backup_point'", at least for those who want to
> recover to the backup point.
> Although I don't have a good naming sense in English, the value should be a
> noun, not an adjective like "immediate", because the value specifies the
> "target (point)" of recovery.
"immediate" is perfectly fine IMO, it fits with what this recovery
target aims at: an immediate consistency point. My 2c on that.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Wim Lewis
Date:
Subject: [review] libpq: Support TLSv1.1+ (was: fe-secure.c and SSL/TLS)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master