Re: Recovery to backup point - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From MauMau
Subject Re: Recovery to backup point
Date
Msg-id B504246BF58B4CEDAE6EFDF58C57053C@maumau
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Recovery to backup point  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
From: "Michael Paquier" <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:08 AM, MauMau <maumau307@gmail.com> wrote:
>> C2. "recovery_target = 'immediate'" sounds less intuitive than my 
>> suggestion
>> "recovery_target_time = 'backup_point'", at least for those who want to
>> recover to the backup point.
>> Although I don't have a good naming sense in English, the value should be 
>> a
>> noun, not an adjective like "immediate", because the value specifies the
>> "target (point)" of recovery.
> "immediate" is perfectly fine IMO, it fits with what this recovery
> target aims at: an immediate consistency point. My 2c on that.

OK, I believe the naming sense of people whose mother tongue is English.  I 
thought the value should be a noun like "earliest_consistency_point" or 
"earliest_consistency" (I don't these are good, though).

Regards
MauMau




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: units in postgresql.conf comments
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master