Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqS1Pu=z6+0x956GDsER+pUvMGEFJ4FjqWRBbzTtv8gbrw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that neither pg_control nor xl_parameter_change need to have the info
> about WAL compression because each backup block has that entry.
>
> Will review the remaining part later.
I got into wondering the utility of this part earlier this morning as
that's some remnant of when wal_compression was set as PGC_POSTMASTER.
Will remove.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: NUMERIC private methods?