On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> I'm going to mark this back to 'waiting on author' in case there's
> something material that I've missed which you can clarify. I had
> started this review thinking to help move it along but after re-reading
> the thread and thinking about it for a bit, I came around to the other
> side and therefore think it should probably be rejected. We certainly
> appreciate the effort, of course.
Re-reading this thread there are 3 perplexed opinions from three
different committers, and nobody pleading in favor of this patch
except me, so let's simply mark this as rejected and move on.
--
Michael
