Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > I'm going to mark this back to 'waiting on author' in case there's
> > something material that I've missed which you can clarify. I had
> > started this review thinking to help move it along but after re-reading
> > the thread and thinking about it for a bit, I came around to the other
> > side and therefore think it should probably be rejected. We certainly
> > appreciate the effort, of course.
>
> Re-reading this thread there are 3 perplexed opinions from three
> different committers, and nobody pleading in favor of this patch
> except me, so let's simply mark this as rejected and move on.
Well I also don't really like the existing behavior but it's not a big
issue and so I'm OK with letting go.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
