Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRHUMSQWOyEViPGzcm2B7fREqJKucZugTU6+azxY4cAgA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes unless many people object the commit.
>
> Michael,
> You're now modifying the patch?
Not within a couple of days.
-- 
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest still shows pending patches?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses