Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Date
Msg-id 10449.1399678959@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes unless many people object the commit.
>> 
>> Michael,
>> You're now modifying the patch?
> Not within a couple of days.

I think it's really too late for this for 9.4.  At this point it's
less than 48 hours until beta1 wraps, and we do not have the bandwidth
to do anything but worry about stabilizing the features we've already
got.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Next
From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Date:
Subject: Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses