Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRH9106kPZCaRvAw1A8SJLWTQcK-P8muCyp+TbpB-1Dpw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:52 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
What's been proposed before that wouldn't break previous applications
is a numbering system like this:

10.0.0
10.0.1
10.0.2
10.0.3
...
11.0.0
11.0.1

i.e. only change the "most-major" version number and always leave the
"less-major" number as zero.
Thanks for the clarification. Firefox did exactly the same from 4.0.
--
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: adding import in pl/python function
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: adding import in pl/python function